Production efficiency as a mediating mechanism linking financial management and agricultural institutions to farm profitability

Abstract

This study examines how financial management and agricultural institutions are associated with farm profitability through production efficiency as a mediating mechanism. The unit of analysis is the individual farm business managed by food-crop farmers in Maros Regency, South Sulawesi, Indonesia. A quantitative explanatory design was used, and survey data from 150 farmers were analyzed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). The results show that financial management and agricultural institutions have positive and significant relationships with production efficiency, with path coefficients of 0.667 and 0.490, respectively. Production efficiency is also positively related to farm profitability (0.618), while the direct relationships of financial management (0.222) and agricultural institutions (0.203) with profitability remain significant but smaller than their mediated pathways. Bootstrapping results indicate significant indirect effects from financial management to profitability through production efficiency (0.412) and from agricultural institutions to profitability through production efficiency (0.303), confirming partial mediation. The model explains 64.3% of the variance in production efficiency and 75.3% of the variance in farm profitability. These findings suggest that managerial and institutional interventions are more likely to improve profitability when they are explicitly directed toward more efficient input use, cost control, and productivity improvement.

Keywords
  • Financial management, Agricultural institutions, Production efficiency, Farm profitability, PLS-SEM
References
  1. Agibalov, A. V., Tkacheva, Y. V., & Zaporozhtseva, L. A. (2017). Improvement of the financial management strategy for agricultural enterprises. Journal of Economic & Management Perspectives, 11(3), 1686-1696.
  2. Battese, G. E., & Coelli, T. J. (1995). A model for technical inefficiency effects in a stochastic frontier production function for panel data. Empirical Economics, 20, 325-332. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01205442
  3. Coelli, T. J., Rao, D. S. P., O'Donnell, C. J., & Battese, G. E. (2005). An introduction to efficiency and productivity analysis (2nd ed.). Springer.
  4. Davidova, S., & Latruffe, L. (2007). Relationships between technical efficiency and financial management for Czech Republic farms. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 58(2), 269-288. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-9552.2007.00109.x
  5. FAO. (2017). The future of food and agriculture: Trends and challenges. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
  6. Farrell, M. J. (1957). The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A, 120(3), 253-290. https://doi.org/10.2307/2343100
  7. Fitri, Y., Fauzia, G., & Nainggolan, S. (2024). Model of determinant factors in improving productivity and sustainability of potato farming in Kerinci District (with SEM-Partial Least Square approach). Jurnal Ilmiah Sosio-Ekonomika Bisnis, 27(2), 16-32.
  8. Galluzzo, N. (2022). Analysis of specialisation and management in Italian farms through a Partial Least Square-Structural Equation Modelling approach. European Countryside, 14(2), 363-378. https://doi.org/10.2478/euco-2022-0018
  9. Gloy, B. A., & LaDue, E. L. (2003). Financial management practices and farm profitability. Agricultural Finance Review, 63(2), 157-174. https://doi.org/10.1108/00215060380001147
  10. Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2-24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
  11. Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43, 115-135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
  12. Hermawati, L., Pusvita, E., Marwa, T., & Yulianita, A. (2025). Analysis of technology adoption and government policy in improving the financial performance of SMEs in the Indonesia agricultural sector. Heritage and Sustainable Development, 7(1), 117-132.
  13. Hien, L. T. D., & Kim, J. (2024). An analysis of relationship quality and loyalty between farmers and agribusiness companies in the rice industry: Using multi-group analysis. Agriculture, 14(12), 2197. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14122197
  14. Imhanrenialena, B. O., & Nwobodo-Anyadiegwu, E. N. (2025). Financial literacy and sustainable food production in rural Nigeria: Access and adoption perspectives. Sustainability, 17(15), 6941.
  15. Kock, N. (2015). Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach. International Journal of e-Collaboration, 11(4), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijec.2015100101
  16. Madani, A., Nabilah, S. N. D., & Purnomo, D. (2025). Analysis of the impact of tractor technology use on time efficiency, rice production costs, and farmers' welfare in Cangkring Village, Plered District, Cirebon Regency. Jurnal Ekonomi Teknologi Dan Bisnis, 4(8), 527-536.
  17. Martinho, V. J. P. D. (2022). Profitability and financial performance of European Union farms: An analysis at both regional and national levels. Open Agriculture, 7(1), 529-540. https://doi.org/10.1515/opag-2022-0108
  18. Matei, A.-C., & Onofrei, M. (2021). Financial management practices for farm profitability. Journal of Public Administration, Finance and Law, 21, 33-38.
  19. Mishra, A., Wilson, C., & Williams, R. (2009). Factors affecting financial performance of new and beginning farmers. Agricultural Finance Review, 69(2), 160-179. https://doi.org/10.1108/00021460910978661
  20. Omobitan, O., & Khanal, A. R. (2022). Examining farm financial management: How do small US farms meet their agricultural expenses? Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 15(3), 133. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm15030133
  21. Rahman, M. T., Nielsen, R., Khan, M. A., & Ankamah-Yeboah, I. (2020). Impact of management practices and managerial ability on the financial performance of aquaculture farms in Bangladesh. Aquaculture Economics & Management, 24(1), 79-101.
  22. Raifu, I. A., & Aminu, A. (2020). Financial development and agricultural performance in Nigeria: What role do institutions play? Agricultural Finance Review, 80(2), 231-254.
  23. Samad, A. W. (2025). The influence of policies and regulations on food security and agribusiness through human resource management using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) with the Partial Least Squares (PLS) approach. Journal of Center for Energy Policy and Human Resources Capacity Development, 2(1), 1-18.
  24. Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Hair, J. F. (2021). Partial least squares structural equation modeling. In Handbook of Market Research (pp. 587-632). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57413-4_15
  25. Vanhuyse, F., Bailey, A., & Tranter, R. (2021). Management practices and the financial performance of farms. Agricultural Finance Review, 81(3), 415-429. https://doi.org/10.1108/AFR-08-2020-0126
  26. Veesam, H., Nikam, V., & Ray, M. (2025). An institutional analysis of performance and impact of farmer producer organizations using PLS path modeling. Evaluation and Program Planning, 111, 102609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2025.102609
  27. Xaba, T., Marwa, N., & Mathur-Helm, B. (2018). Efficiency and profitability analysis of agricultural cooperatives in Mpumalanga, South Africa.
  28. Zuhri, N. M., Khamdi, A., Santoso, W. I., Ayomi, N. M. S., Puspita, N., Suharti, S., Purwanto, E., Ibrahim, A. L., Dimitha, N., & Furqansyah, M. D. (2024). Farmers' strategic of the sustainability of corporate-based cassava farming: A study of technology adoption on farming performance. E3S Web of Conferences, 595, 01001.