Development and validation of an explainable rule-based clinical decision support system for childhood immunization using rule traceability

Abstract

Childhood immunization is essential for preventing vaccine-preventable diseases, yet immunization decisions in primary healthcare are often affected by false contraindications, inconsistent guideline interpretation, and dynamic clinical conditions. This study developed and evaluated an Explainable Clinical Decision Support System (X-CDSS) that integrates rule-based reasoning, dynamic clinical variables, and explainable rule traceability to provide transparent, guideline-compliant immunization recommendations. A Research and Development (R&D) approach with iterative prototyping was employed. Knowledge from the Indonesian national immunization guideline, scientific literature, field observations, and healthcare professionals was formalized into 35 IF–THEN production rules implemented using a forward-chaining inference mechanism in a web-based application. The system was evaluated through functional testing, clinical validation using 40 representative scenarios, performance evaluation, and User Acceptance Testing involving seven healthcare professionals. The proposed system achieved an accuracy of 92.5%, precision of 96.6%, recall of 93.3%, an F1-score of 94.9%, and a Cohen's Kappa coefficient of 0.81, with an overall usability score of 4.3/5.0. These findings demonstrate that the proposed X-CDSS provides reliable, transparent, and clinically accountable decision support for routine childhood immunization in primary healthcare.

Keywords
  • Childhood Immunization
  • Clinical Decision Support System
  • Explainable Artificial Intelligence
  • Forward Chaining
  • Rule-Based Reasoning
References
  1. Abbas, Q., Jeong, W., & Lee, S. W. (2025). Explainable AI in Clinical Decision Support Systems: A Meta-Analysis of Methods, Applications, and Usability Challenges. Healthcare, 13(17), 2154. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13172154
  2. Andrade-Guerrero, L., de la Cruz-Vargas, J. A., Rojas, E., & Torres, M. (2023). Artificial intelligence and health information systems in primary healthcare: Opportunities and challenges. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 175, 105102.
  3. Arrieta, A. B., Díaz-Rodríguez, N., Del Ser, J., Bennetot, A., Tabik, S., Barbado, A., García, S., Gil-López, S., Molina, D., Benjamins, R., Chatila, R., & Herrera, F. (2020). Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI. Information Fusion, 58, 82–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2019.12.012
  4. Bharati, S., Mondal, M. R. H., & Podder, P. (2023). A review on explainable artificial intelligence for healthcare: Why, how, and when? Healthcare Analytics, 4, 100212.
  5. Holzinger, A., Carrington, A., & Müller, H. (2020). Measuring the quality of explanations: The system causability scale (SCS). KI – Künstliche Intelligenz, 34(2), 193–198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13218-020-00636-z
  6. Huynh, T., Nguyen, H., & Tran, P. (2022). Clinical decision support systems in primary healthcare: A systematic review. Healthcare Informatics Research, 28(4), 275–289.
  7. Jing X, Min H, Gong Y, Biondich P, Robinson D, Law T, Nohr C, Faxvaag A, Rennert L, Hubig N, Gimbel R. Ontologies Applied in Clinical Decision Support System Rules: Systematic Review. JMIR Med Inform 2023;11:e43053 URL: https://medinform.jmir.org/2023/1/e43053 DOI: 10.2196/43053
  8. Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. (2017). Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia Nomor 12 Tahun 2017 tentang Penyelenggaraan Imunisasi. Jakarta, Indonesia: Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia.
  9. Kierner S, Kierner P, Kucharski J. Combining machine learning models and rule engines in clinical decision systems: Exploring optimal aggregation methods for vaccine hesitancy prediction. Comput Biol Med. 2025 Apr;188:109749. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.109749. Epub 2025 Feb 20. PMID: 39983355.
  10. Kim K, Lee M, Shin HK, Lee H, Kim B and Kang S (2022) Development and application of survey-based artificial intelligence for clinical decision support in managing infectious diseases: A pilot study on a hospital in central Vietnam. Front. Public Health 10:1023098. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1023098
  11. Kim, S. Y., Kim, D. H., Kim, M. J., Ko, H. J., & Jeong, O. R. (2024). XAI-Based Clinical Decision Support Systems: A Systematic Review. Applied Sciences, 14(15), 6638. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14156638
  12. Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310
  13. Mayatopani, H., Wiyandra, Y., & Rahmaddeni. (2022). Expert system for mental disorder diagnosis using Dempster–Shafer theory. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 13(8), 350–358.
  14. Nasarian, E., Alizadehsani, R., Acharya, U. R., & Tsui, K. L. (2023). Designing interpretable machine learning systems to enhance trust in healthcare: A systematic review. Artificial Intelligence Review, 56(8), 7851–7884.
  15. Orlioglu S, Boobalan AS, Abanyie K, Boyce RD, Min H, Gong Y, Sittig DF, Biondich P, Wright A, Nøhr C, Law T, Robinson D, Faxvaag A, Hubig N, Gimbel R, Rennert L, Jing X. Reusable Generic Clinical Decision Support System Module for Immunization Recommendations in Resource-Constraint Settings. AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc. 2025 Jun 10;2025:395-404. PMID: 40502239; PMCID: PMC12150700
  16. Ramgopal, S., Sanchez-Pinto, L. N., Horvat, C. M., Carroll, M. S., Luo, Y., & Florin, T. A. (2023). Artificial intelligence-based clinical decision support in pediatrics. Pediatric research, 93(2), 334–341. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-022-02226-1
  17. Sharma, S. ., Giami, K. L. ., & Chukwuemeka, U. S. . (2026). Explainable and Bias-Aware AI Models for Clinical Decision Support in U.S.Healthcare Systems. International Journal of Public Health and Nursing, 2(1), 40-52. https://doi.org/10.54536/ijphn.v2i1.6988
  18. Tan R, Cobuccio L, Beynon F, Levine GA, Vaezipour N, Luwanda LB, et al. (2023) ePOCT+ and the medAL-suite: Development of an electronic clinical decision support algorithm and digital platform for pediatric outpatients in low- and middle-income countries. PLOS Digit Health 2(1): e0000170. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000170
  19. World Health Organization. (2021). Global strategy on digital health 2020–2025. World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240020924