Analisis faktor-faktor kejenuhan belajar berdasarkan perspektif siswa dan guru dalam konteks implementasi kurikulum sekolah

  • Abdul Hamid Arribathi 
    Universitas Raharja
    Indonesia
  • Suwarto Suwarto
    Indonesia

Abstract

Kejenuhan belajar merupakan salah satu tantangan yang memengaruhi kualitas pengalaman belajar peserta didik dalam implementasi kurikulum sekolah. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis faktor-faktor yang memengaruhi kejenuhan belajar berdasarkan perspektif siswa dan guru. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan desain studi fenomenologis. Partisipan terdiri atas empat siswa dan empat guru yang dipilih melalui purposive sampling berdasarkan pengalaman mereka dalam proses pembelajaran di SMA Negeri 2 Kabupaten Tangerang. Data dikumpulkan melalui wawancara mendalam menggunakan pedoman wawancara yang telah divalidasi oleh pakar, kemudian dianalisis secara tematik mengacu pada Miles, Huberman, dan Saldaña melalui tahapan transkripsi, open coding, kategorisasi, pengembangan tema, interpretasi, dan penarikan kesimpulan. Kredibilitas data diperkuat melalui triangulasi sumber dan member checking. Hasil penelitian mengidentifikasi empat tema utama yang memengaruhi kejenuhan belajar, yaitu (1) menurunnya motivasi dan keterlibatan belajar; (2) metode pembelajaran yang kurang bervariasi; (3) beban akademik dan durasi pembelajaran yang berlebihan; dan (4) kualitas hubungan guru–siswa dan dukungan belajar. Penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa kejenuhan belajar merupakan fenomena multidimensional yang terbentuk melalui interaksi antara karakteristik peserta didik, praktik pedagogis guru, dan konteks implementasi kurikulum. Integrasi perspektif siswa dan guru memberikan pemahaman yang lebih komprehensif mengenai dinamika kejenuhan belajar dibandingkan penggunaan satu perspektif saja.

Keywords
  • Kejenuhan belajar, Strategi mengatasi kejenuhan, Beban tugas, Dukungan social, Durasi waktu belajar, Learning boredom
Lisensing Information
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

References
  1. Abuhassna, H., Al-Rahmi, W. M., Yahya, N., Zakaria, M. A. Z. M., Kosnin, A. Bt. M., & Darwish, M. (2020). Development of a new model on utilizing online learning platforms to improve students’ academic achievements and satisfaction. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 38. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00216-z
  2. Albert, B. (2007). Social Learning Theory of Aggression. In Control of aggression (pp. 201-252). Routledge.
  3. Bandhu, D., Mohan, M. M., Nittala, N. A. P., Jadhav, P., Bhadauria, A., & Saxena, K. K. (2024). Theories of motivation: A comprehensive analysis of human behavior drivers. Acta Psychologica, 244, 104177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104177
  4. Chin, A., Markey, A., Bhargava, S., Kassam, K. S., & Loewenstein, G. (2017). Bored in the USA: Experience sampling and boredom in everyday life. Emotion, 17(2), 359–368. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000232
  5. Derakhshan, A., Kruk, M., Mehdizadeh, M., & Pawlak, M. (2021). Boredom in online classes in the Iranian EFL context: Sources and solutions. System, 101, 102556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102556
  6. Dewaele, J.-M., & Li, C. (2021). Teacher enthusiasm and students’ social-behavioral learning engagement: The mediating role of student enjoyment and boredom in Chinese EFL classes. Language Teaching Research, 25(6), 922–945. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211014538
  7. Erlangga, D. T. (2022). Student problems in online learning: solutions to keep education going on. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 3(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.33365/jeltl.v3i1.1694
  8. Hartnett, M. (2019). Theories of Motivation in Open and Distance Education. In I. Jung (Ed.), Open and Distance Education Theory Revisited: Implications for the Digital Era (pp. 105–113). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7740-2_12
  9. Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., Kirschner, F., & Zambrano R., J. (2018). From Cognitive Load Theory to Collaborative Cognitive Load Theory. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 13(2), 213–233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-018-9277-y
  10. Kruk, M., Pawlak, M., Elahi Shirvan, M., & Shahnama, M. (2022). The emergence of boredom in an online language class: An ecological perspective. System, 107, 102803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2022.102803
  11. Li, C., Dewaele, J.-M., & Hu, Y. (2023). Foreign language learning boredom: Conceptualization and measurement. Applied Linguistics Review, 14(2), 223–249. https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2020-0124
  12. Loeb, S., Dynarski, S., McFarland, D., Morris, P., Reardon, S., & Reber, S. (2017). Descriptive Analysis in Education: A Guide for Researchers. NCEE 2017-4023. In National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance. National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED573325
  13. Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. Third Edition. In SAGE Publications Ltd (CA). SAGE Publications.
  14. Nakamura, S., Darasawang, P., & Reinders, H. (2021). The antecedents of boredom in L2 classroom learning. System, 98, 102469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102469
  15. Obergriesser, S., & Stoeger, H. (2020). Students’ emotions of enjoyment and boredom and their use of cognitive learning strategies – How do they affect one another? Learning and Instruction, 66, 101285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.101285
  16. Özerk, G. (2020). Academic Boredom: An Underestimated Challenge in Schools. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 13(1), 117–125.
  17. Parker, P. C., Perry, R. P., Chipperfield, J. G., Hamm, J. M., & Pekrun, R. (2018). An attribution-based motivation treatment for low control students who are bored in online learning environments. Motivation Science, 4(2), 177–184. https://doi.org/10.1037/mot0000081
  18. Pawlak, M., Kruk, M., Zawodniak, J., & Pasikowski, S. (2020). Investigating factors responsible for boredom in English classes: The case of advanced learners. System, 91, 102259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102259
  19. Putwain, D. W., Becker, S., Symes, W., & Pekrun, R. (2018). Reciprocal relations between students’ academic enjoyment, boredom, and achievement over time. Learning and Instruction, 54, 73–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.08.004
  20. Sharp, J. G., Hemmings, B., Kay, R., & Atkin, C. (2018). Academic boredom, approaches to learning and the final-year degree outcomes of undergraduate students. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 42(8), 1055–1077. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2017.1349883
  21. Sharp, J. G., Hemmings, B., Kay, R., Murphy, B., & Elliott, S. (2017). Academic boredom among students in higher education: A mixed-methods exploration of characteristics, contributors and consequences. Journal of Further and Higher Education. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0309877X.2016.1159292
  22. Sharp, J. G., Sharp, J. C., & Young, E. (2020). Academic boredom, engagement and the achievement of undergraduate students at university: A review and synthesis of relevant literature. Research Papers in Education. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02671522.2018.1536891
  23. Skulmowski, A., & Xu, K. M. (2022). Understanding Cognitive Load in Digital and Online Learning: A New Perspective on Extraneous Cognitive Load. Educational Psychology Review, 34(1), 171–196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09624-7
  24. Sweller, J. (2020). Cognitive load theory and educational technology. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09701-3
  25. Van den Broeck, A., Howard, J. L., Van Vaerenbergh, Y., Leroy, H., & Gagné, M. (2021). Beyond intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: A meta-analysis on self-determination theory’s multidimensional conceptualization of work motivation. Organizational Psychology Review, 11(3), 240–273. https://doi.org/10.1177/20413866211006173
  26. Wang, H., Burić, I., Chang, M.-L., & Gross, J. J. (2023). Teachers’ emotion regulation and related environmental, personal, instructional, and well-being factors: A meta-analysis. Social Psychology of Education, 26(6), 1651–1696. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-023-09810-1

Downloads

PDF

Statistic

Abstract Views
: 62 times
PDF
: 14 times