Transformational leadership-trust conversion through digital transparency and communication: a systematic review

  • Ednawan Prihana 
    Universitas Langlangbuana, Indonesia
    Indonesia
  • Slamet Suwanto
    Universitas Langlangbuana, Indonesia
    Indonesia

Abstract

This systematic review synthesizes how transformational and digital leadership are connected to public trust through organizational capability, digital transparency, dialogic communication, service performance, and procedural fairness, with Indonesia as the primary institutional context. Searches covered 2012-29 July 2026 across Google Scholar, GARUDA, publisher portals, Crossref/DOI records, and backward citations. Peer-reviewed public-sector studies with an explicit method and evidence for at least two focal constructs were eligible. Of 78 identified records, 31 were retained after screening and quality appraisal: 19 Indonesia-focused and 12 international or comparative studies. Screening, extraction, and coding were completed in two sequential passes by one reviewer using a structured evidence matrix and an MMAT-informed, design-sensitive appraisal; independent inter-rater agreement was therefore not calculated. Because designs, measures, and reported effects were not statistically comparable, narrative thematic synthesis was used instead of meta-analysis. The corpus provides stronger evidence for adjacent links than for a complete causal leadership-trust chain. Leadership is associated with internal capability and ethical climate, while trust is more consistently associated with usable and verifiable transparency, responsive communication, reliable services, and fair correction. Comparative evidence also shows that visibility, participation, or digitalization alone does not necessarily increase trust. The review proposes an evidence-informed conversion framework in which internal leadership conditions shape citizen-facing governance mechanisms that inform competence, integrity, and benevolence judgments under contextual boundary conditions.

Keywords
  • Transformational leadership, Public trust, Digital transparency, Public communication, Systematic review
Lisensing Information
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

References
  1. Alessandro, M., Cardinale Lagomarsino, B., Scartascini, C., Streb, J., & Torrealday, J. (2021). Transparency and trust in government: Evidence from a survey experiment. World Development, 138, 105223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105223
  2. Annisa, S., & Rianti, A. (2021). Transformative leadership of Wali Nagari Pakan Sinayan Banuhampu Agam Regency in achieving the achievement of Nagari Rancak in 2018. TRANSFORMASI: Jurnal Manajemen Pemerintahan, 13(1), 36-47. https://doi.org/10.33701/jtp.v13i1.1242
  3. Arkorful, V. E., Lugu, B. K., Hammond, A., & Basiru, I. (2021). Decentralization and citizens' participation in local governance: Does trust and transparency matter? An empirical study. Forum for Development Studies, 48(2), 199-223. https://doi.org/10.1080/08039410.2021.1872698
  4. Beshi, T. D., & Kaur, R. (2020). Public trust in local government: Explaining the role of good governance practices. Public Organization Review, 20, 337-350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-019-00444-6
  5. Branderhorst, E. M., & Ruijer, E. (2025). Digital leadership in local government: An empirical study of Dutch city managers. Local Government Studies, 51(3), 576-599. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2024.2363368
  6. Davis, J. H., Schoorman, F. D., & Donaldson, L. (1997). Toward a stewardship theory of management. Academy of Management Review, 22(1), 20-47. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1997.9707180258
  7. Edelman Trust Institute. (2024). 2024 Edelman Trust Barometer: Indonesia report. Edelman.
  8. Fadrial, R., Sujianto, Simanjuntak, H. T. R. F., Wirman, W., & Wibowo, W. S. (2024). Fostering trust through bytes: Unravelling the impact of e-government on public trust in Indonesian local government. Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge, and Management, 19, Article 015. https://doi.org/10.28945/5317
  9. Fardiah, D., Darmawan, F., Rinawati, R., Supaat, V. E. M., & Hadnansyah, E. (2024). Digital transformation through electronic-based government system performance as public relations strategy. PRofesi Humas, 9(1), 23-48. https://doi.org/10.24198/prh.v9i1.56095
  10. Grimmelikhuijsen, S., & Knies, E. (2017). Validating a scale for citizen trust in government organizations. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 83(3), 583-601. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852315585950
  11. Hartanto, D., Agussani, A., & Dalle, J. (2021a). Antecedents of public trust in government during the COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia: Mediation of perceived religious values. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 8(4), 321-341. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejecs/975
  12. Hartanto, D., Dalle, J., Akrim, A., & Anisah, H. U. (2021b). Perceived effectiveness of e-governance as an underlying mechanism between good governance and public trust: A case of Indonesia. Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance, 23(6), 598-616. https://doi.org/10.1108/DPRG-03-2021-0046
  13. Hartanto, D., & Siregar, S. M. (2021). Determinants of overall public trust in local government: Mediation of government response to COVID-19 in Indonesian context. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 15(2), 261-274. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-08-2020-0193
  14. Holum, M. (2023). Citizen participation: Linking government efforts, actual participation, and trust in local politicians. International Journal of Public Administration, 46(13), 915-925. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2022.2048667
  15. Hong, Q. N., Fabregues, S., Bartlett, G., Boardman, F., Cargo, M., Dagenais, P., Gagnon, M. P., Griffiths, F., Nicolau, B., O'Cathain, A., Rousseau, M. C., Vedel, I., & Pluye, P. (2018). The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) version 2018 for information professionals and researchers. Education for Information, 34(4), 285-291. https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-180221
  16. Ibrahim, A. H. H., Baharuddin, T., & Wance, M. (2023). Bibliometric analysis of e-government and trust: A lesson for Indonesia. Jurnal Borneo Administrator, 19(3), 269-284. https://doi.org/10.24258/jba.v19i3.1303
  17. Idris, H. (2020). Transparansi informasi meningkatkan level kepercayaan terhadap laporan kinerja pemerintah. Bata Ilyas Journal of Accounting, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.37531/bijak.v1i1.862
  18. Jensen, U. T., Moynihan, D. P., & Salomonsen, H. H. (2018). Communicating the vision: How face-to-face dialogue facilitates transformational leadership. Public Administration Review, 78(3), 350-361. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12922
  19. Matheus, R., Janssen, M., & Janowski, T. (2021). Design principles for creating digital transparency in government. Government Information Quarterly, 38(1), 101550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101550
  20. Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709-734. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9508080335
  21. Moynihan, D. P., Pandey, S. K., & Wright, B. E. (2012). Setting the table: How transformational leadership fosters performance information use. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(1), 143-164. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mur024
  22. Mulaphong, D. (2023). Citizen engagement in coproductive community services: Examining the influence of community attachment, trust in the local government, and the leadership of local elected officials. Community Development, 54(5), 767-782. https://doi.org/10.1080/15575330.2022.2127155
  23. Murni, M., & Irawati, R. I. (2025). Kepemimpinan transformasional Kepala Badan Kepegawaian dan Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia (BKPSDM) Kota Cirebon. Responsive, 8(1), 68-79. https://doi.org/10.24198/responsive.v8i1.61181
  24. Nathaniel, A., Sumartono, & Muslim, A. Q. (2026). Determinants of public trust in e-government: A comprehensive review and conceptual framework over the past decade. BISNIS & BIROKRASI: Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi dan Organisasi, 33(2), 77-88. https://doi.org/10.20476/jbb.v33i2.1625
  25. Novianto. (2023). Systematic literature review: Models of digital transformation in the public sector. Policy & Governance Review, 7(2), 170-194. https://doi.org/10.30589/pgr.v7i2.753
  26. Nuryadin, R., Sobandi, A., & Santoso, B. (2023). Digital leadership in the public sector: Systematic literature review. Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi: Media Pengembangan Ilmu dan Praktek Administrasi, 20(1), 90-106. https://doi.org/10.31113/jia.v20i1.934
  27. Osborne, S. P. (2006). The New Public Governance? Public Management Review, 8(3), 377-387. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719030600853022
  28. Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., et al. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
  29. Porumbescu, G. A. (2016). Linking public sector social media and e-government website use to trust in government. Government Information Quarterly, 33(2), 291-304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.04.006
  30. Pramiyanti, A., Mayangsari, I. D., Nuraeni, R., & Firdaus, Y. D. (2020). Public perception on transparency and trust in government information released during the COVID-19 pandemic. Asian Journal for Public Opinion Research, 8(3), 351-376. https://doi.org/10.15206/ajpor.2020.8.3.351
  31. Raharja, S. J., Fanesa, F., & Rivani, R. (2022). Penerapan kepemimpinan transformasional perusahaan: Studi pada PDAM Tirta Alami Batusangkar Sumatera Barat. AdBispreneur, 7(2), 143-151. https://doi.org/10.24198/adbispreneur.v7i2.38929
  32. Sartika, I. (2023). Kepemimpinan pemerintahan dalam transformasi digital di Kabupaten Sumedang. Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi Pemerintahan Daerah, 15(2), 222-236. https://doi.org/10.33701/jiapd.v15i2.3830
  33. Schoorman, F. D., Mayer, R. C., & Davis, J. H. (2007). An integrative model of organizational trust: Past, present, and future. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 344-354. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.24348410
  34. Setyaningrum, M. D., & Kriswibowo, A. (2022). Gaya kepemimpinan transformasional Kepala Desa Sekapuk Kecamatan Ujungpangkah Kabupaten Gresik dalam pengembangan desa wisata. Jurnal Noken: Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial, 8(1), 27-40. https://doi.org/10.33506/jn.v8i1.1826
  35. Taufiqurokhman, Izzatusholekha, Mawar, Rahman, A., & Handayani, N. (2026). Leadership in the digital era: Building public trust and participation. SWATANTRA, 24(1), 75-88. https://doi.org/10.24853/swatantra.24.1.75-88
  36. Taufiqurokhman, T., Satispi, E., Andriansyah, A., Murod, M., & Sulastri, E. (2024). The impact of e-service quality on public trust and public satisfaction in e-government public services. International Journal of Data and Network Science, 8(2), 765-772. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ijdns.2024.1.002
  37. Tyler, T. R. (2006). Why people obey the law (2nd ed.). Princeton University Press.
  38. Virnandes, S. R., Shen, J., & Vlahu-Gjorgievska, E. (2024). Building public trust through digital government transformation: A qualitative study of Indonesian civil service agency. Procedia Computer Science, 234, 1183-1191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2024.03.114
  39. Wang, Q., & Guan, Z. (2023). Can sunlight disperse mistrust? A meta-analysis of the effect of transparency on citizens' trust in government. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 33(3), 453-467. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muac040
  40. Wright, B. E., Moynihan, D. P., & Pandey, S. K. (2012). Pulling the levers: Transformational leadership, public service motivation, and mission valence. Public Administration Review, 72(2), 206-215. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02496.x

Downloads

PDF

Statistic

Abstract Views
: 54 times
PDF
: 25 times