Parental engagement and academic transparency through mobile information systems in vocational education

  • W Wagino 
    Universitas Negeri Padang
    Indonesia
  • Alfridho Leoparlin
    Universitas Negeri Padang
    Indonesia
  • Wawan Purwanto
    Universitas Negeri Padang
    Indonesia
  • M Giatman
    Universitas Negeri Padang
    Indonesia

Abstract

The manual management of teacher journals, agendas, and student attendance in Indonesian vocational schools (SMK) often limits real-time information access for parents, resulting in one-way communication and limited academic transparency. This study aimed to develop and evaluate DIJAGA, a mobile-based academic information system integrating teacher journals, student attendance, and parental monitoring. The Research and Development (R&D) method using the ADDIE model was employed. The study involved one media expert, two content experts, 43 teachers, 124 parents, and attendance data from 180 students. Data were collected through expert validation, practicality and effectiveness questionnaires, and a one-group pretest-posttest attendance assessment. The results showed high validity, with mean Aiken's V values of 0.833 for media and 0.816 for content. DIJAGA was considered practical by 95% of teachers and 91% of parents, while the effectiveness score reached 80.41%. Student attendance increased from 87.22% to 92.05%, with a significant paired-samples t-test result, t(179) = 6.975, p < .05. The N-Gain score was 0.378 (moderate), and Cohen's d was 0.520 (moderate). These findings indicate that DIJAGA is a valid, practical, and potentially effective system for improving academic transparency, parental trust, communication, and student attendance. However, because the study used a one-group pretest-posttest design without a comparison group, the findings should be interpreted as exploratory evidence of feasibility rather than definitive causal evidence.

Keywords
  • Mobile academic information system
  • Parental engagement
  • Academic transparency
  • Student attendance
  • Vocational education
  • ADDIE model
Lisensing Information
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

References
  1. Amelia, R., Zamzani, Mustadi, A., Ghufron, A., Suriansyah, A., & Aslamiah, I. N. (2023). Parental involvement in digital learning: Mother's experiences of elementary school students. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (IJIM), 17(10), 118-135. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v17i10.38253
  2. Ancheta, R. F., Daniel, D., & Ahmad, R. (2021). Effect of class attendance on academic performance. European Journal of Education Studies, 8(9), 115-131. https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v8i9.3887
  3. Antony-Newman, M. (2024). Teachers and school leaders' readiness for parental engagement: Critical policy analysis of Canadian standards. Journal of Teacher Education, 75(3), 321-333. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224871231199365
  4. Ariani, F., Ulfatin, N., Supriyanto, A., & Arifin, I. (2022). Implementing online integrated character education and parental engagement in local cultural values cultivation. European Journal of Educational Research, 11(3), 1699-1714.
  5. Arikunto, S. (2013). Dasar-dasar evaluasi pendidikan. Bumi Aksara.
  6. Banic, L., & Orehovacki, T. (2024). The texture of parental experiences with online learning: The interplay of norms, relationships, and emotions. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 46(1), 75-93. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2024.2426143
  7. Basri, B., Asnari, A., Tamin, R., Syarli, S., & Nurahmad, N. (2020). Monitoring kehadiran dan perilaku peserta didik dengan sistem integrasi presensi dan buku penghubung berbasis Android. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Komputer (JIIF), 6(2), 28-34. https://doi.org/10.35329/jiik.v6i2.151
  8. Borg, W. R., & Gall, M. D. (1983). Educational research: An introduction (4th ed.). Longman.
  9. Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional design: The ADDIE approach. Springer.
  10. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  11. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
  12. Efriani, L., Sanjaya, M. R., Paradina, S., Pronika, G., Angraini, L., & Ghifari, M. F. (2025). Pengembangan aplikasi mobile untuk meningkatkan minat belajar matematika anak berbasis Research and Development. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia: Teori, Penelitian, dan Inovasi, 5(4), 112-125.
  13. Eliza, F., Hakiki, M., Fadli, R., Trisnawati, W., Abdulah, P., Suri, R. M., & Ridoh, A. (2024). Android-based mobile learning application using App Inventor on computer operating system material: The development and validity study. TEM Journal, 13(1), 624-634.
  14. Epstein, J. L. (2011). School, family, and community partnerships: Preparing educators and improving schools. Westview Press.
  15. Eskandari, S., & Valente, J. P. (2022). An extended technology acceptance model in the context of mobile learning for primary school students. In M. E. Auer & T. Tsiatsos (Eds.), New realities, mobile systems and applications (Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, Vol. 411). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96296-8_25
  16. Fatimah, W. S., & Fauzan, K. (2024). Pengaruh kedisiplinan terhadap prestasi belajar pada siswa di SMK Negeri 8 Medan. Jurnal Psychomutiara, 7(1), 24-32.
  17. Guo, L., & Keles, S. (2024). A systematic review of studies with parent-involved interventions for children with specific learning disabilities. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 40(4), 755-772. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2024.2421112
  18. Hake, R. R. (1999). Analyzing change/gain scores. Indiana University.
  19. Harper, F. K., Rosenberg, J. M., Comperry, S., Howell, K., & Womble, S. (2021). #Mathathome during the COVID-19 pandemic: Exploring and reimagining resources and social supports for parents. Education Sciences, 11(2), 60. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11020060
  20. Jeremiah, S. R., & Mtebe, J. S. (2018). Development of digital diary for enhanced parental school involvement. International Journal of Education and Development using ICT, 14(2), 1-17.
  21. Nieveen, N. (1999). Prototyping to reach product quality. In J. van den Akker, R. M. Branch, K. Gustafson, N. Nieveen, & T. Plomp (Eds.), Design approaches and tools in education and training (pp. 125-135). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  22. Nursodiq, A. (2025). Analysis of the role of management information systems (MIS) in educational institutions. Journal of Educational Management and Information Systems, 4(1), 22-35.
  23. Nursyani, R., Nadhirah, N. A., Budiman, N., & Samae, S. B. M. R. (2025). Counselor-parent communication dynamics in enhancing students' psychological well-being: A qualitative literature review. JIGC (Journal of Islamic Guidance and Counseling), 9(1), 1-15.
  24. Rahaman, M., Islam, M. M., & Nandi, D. (2025). SmartPresence: Wi-Fi-based online attendance management for smart academic assistance. Journal of Electrical Systems and Information Technology, 12(1), Article 23.
  25. Rohman, N. A., Qosim, N., & Badruddin, M. F. (2025). The role of AROMAZA-based educational information systems in increasing parental involvement. Managere: Indonesian Journal of Educational Management, 7(1), 25-37. https://doi.org/10.52627/managere.v7i1.751
  26. Santrock, J. W. (2018). Adolescence (17th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
  27. Sugiyono. (2019). Metode penelitian & pengembangan (Research and development/R&D). Alfabeta.

Downloads

PDF

Statistic

Abstract Views
: 74 times
PDF
: 3 times